Are 2km CSG buffer zones in NSW practical and workable? > Check the facts
Who: “the bottom line is … it needs to be a buffer from major urban population centers not from hamlets, and the gas companies are saying the system in NSW right now is simply not practical or workable”. Federal Resources Minister Ian Macfarlane
The claim: The buffer zone in NSW is now not practical or workable. The buffer zone should only be around major urban populations and not smaller groups of households.
The facts: In 2013 the NSW government announced that it would be introducing regulations that created a two kilometre exclusion zone for CSG wells around residential areas and critical industry clusters for the equine and viticulture industries.
In 2011 the Victorian government introduced changes to the states planning laws that allowed a house owner within two kilometres of a proposed wind turbine to veto the project.
The finding: The restrictions on wind turbines within two kilometres of any house show that a state government can use its planning laws to create buffer zones for energy projects around homes. The NSW government’s two kilometre buffer zone is therefore practical and workable.
Discussion of evidence: The buffer zones introduced by the Victorian government show a state government can use their planning laws to restrict certain projects. The experience in Victoria was the buffer zones severely restricted the industry’s ability to construct new wind turbines. It is possible that a buffer zone around residential areas (not houses) could also restrict the gas industry’s ability to expand its CSG operations.
It is also interesting to note that on the 27th April 2013, Mr Macfarlane spoke at a rally at Cecil Plains in Queensland in which he said;
“I was the one who drove the issue in New South Wales where the resource companies were told they couldn’t drill within two kilometres of houses.” Ian Macfarlane
Before the election Mr Macfarlane not only agreed with the exclusion zone he claimed to have been behind the idea. He also believed the exclusion zone should be around all houses. After the election he is now critical of the exclusion zone and seems to agree with the gas industry that they are not practical or workable and that the zones should be limited to major urban populations.
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Negative Gearing, Dodgy Specials, and New Coal Mines
Labor gearing up for a change? 28 September 2024 +++ The Wrap with Ebony Bennett Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek approved three new coal mine extensions this week, completely undermining the government’s credibility on climate change. At the same time Foreign Minister Penny Wong was at the United Nations General Assembly talking about sea level rise
Coal royalties are a tiny part of the NSW Budget
The people of Australia collectively own all the resources under the ground. This means that the coal in NSW is the property of the Australian people too. Because of this, mining companies have to pay the NSW Government a “royalty” if they want to dig up and sell coal. Royalties are not taxes. They are
NSW government now spending more public money on coal boosting than coal transition
The NSW Government is currently spending significantly more public money promoting coal than helping regional communities’ transition away from it, according to new research by the Australia Institute.