Good politics, good policy
Julia Gillard’s multi-party committee on climate change (MPCCC) has achieved what the Rudd government should have relied on its cabinet for – a good political outcome likely to deliver a good policy outcome on that wicked problem of climate change. While there is still plenty of room for negotiations to go off the rails, the architecture announced yesterday stakes out ground that will ensure the various politicians involved will be able to focus on what unites them (support for a carbon price) rather than what divides them (the exact emission reduction targets for 2020). It’s not just good politics though. By focusing on the areas of broad agreement, the MPCCC architecture allows for the pursuit of an ambitious timetable for the introduction of a carbon price in July next year. While the exact carbon price is yet to be negotiated the preferred mechanism, a so-called ‘fixed-price emissions trading scheme’ allows for the introduction of a carbon price which will rise steadily over time while issues such as 2020 targets are being negotiated.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Australia’s Climate of Discontent
Australia gives more aid to foreign fossil fuel companies than it does to our neighbours in the Pacific.
Massive Gap Between Rhetoric and Actions on Emissions
Farmers know you can’t fatten a pig on market day and scientists know you can’t reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 while expanding coal, oil and gas production.
Why are gas companies trying to sell us hydrogen?
The hydrogen dream has become widespread in the Australian climate conversation: apparently, with it, we’re going to decarbonise Japan, Korea, and the world! Is this ambitious vision a genuine step towards a greener future or merely a diversion from ongoing fossil fuel expansion?