Bank customers pay for oligopoly
Neoclassical economics has a clear definition of a competitive market, but it has been so debased by Australian politicians and business leaders that it now borders on meaningless. According to mainstream textbooks, a competitive market is one in which there are lots of buyers and sellers, none of whom have any market power. Buyers are well informed, they shop around on price, and suppliers make only enough profit to cover their costs. The Australian Bankers Association must be reading some different textbooks. According to a press release by the ABA’s Steven Munchenberg, the banking industry is “fiercely competitive”, despite the fact that of the 100 banks, credit unions and building societies trading in Australia, the big four banks have 84 per cent of home lending. Neoclassical textbooks describe such a market as an oligopoly.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Australian banks now make $228,900 profit from the average home loan – new research
New research by The Australia Institute reveals the big four banks are raking in $228,900 profit over the 30-year life of an average $736,000 home loan.
Australian CEOs are still getting their bonuses. Performance doesn’t seem to matter so much.
Almost all of Australia’s top chief executives are, according to their boards at least, knocking it out of the park in terms of performance.
ANZ profit completes obscene $43 billion quadrella
The ANZ bank has today posted an $8.8 billion profit, completing an obscene quadrella from Australia’s big 4 banks.


