Business should be wary of cuts
Last week, the newly installed Prime Minister Kevin Rudd challenged Tony Abbott to a debate about public sector debts and deficits. If it goes ahead, it would likely be a rare respite from the slogans that have haunted Australian public debate for the past few years.
But the debate that we should be watching is one between the retail sector and the mining industry about what they each think constitutes good macroeconomic policy.
We all know the miners want the mining tax and the carbon tax abolished, but do the retailers? Would they really prefer to see consumers pay higher income taxes and the foreign owners of 83 per cent of Australian mining operations pay less?
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
10 reasons why Australia does not need company tax cuts
1/ Giving business billions of dollars in tax cuts means starving schools, hospitals and other services. Giving business billions of dollars in tax cuts means billions of dollars less for services like schools and hospitals. If Australia cut company tax from 30% to 25% this would give business about $20 billion in its first year,
Business groups want the government to overhaul the tax system? Excellent – we have some ideas.
The landslide win by the ALP has seen business groups come out demanding the government listen to their demands despite having provided them no support, and plenty of opposition, over the past 3 years.
The Liberal Party defies its own history on tax
For decades, the Liberal Party has prided itself on being the “party of lower taxes”.