Can you eat the family home? > Check the facts
The new Social Services Minister Scott Morrison is concerned about retirees who are cash poor but asset rich. Labor Deputy Leader Tanya Plibersek raised similar concerns, saying:
‘You can’t eat your family home, you can’t pay your electricity bill with it.’
But an existing government scheme allows retirees to do just that.
The Pension Loans Scheme (PLS) allows retirees to draw an income from the government by borrowing against their home while they live in it. The balance of the loan is later settled from the estate, but retirees cannot be forced out of their home.
While there are commercial ‘reverse mortgages’, the PLS provides an interest rate much lower than available on the private market. The PLS has been in operation for decades and is available only to retirees who are excluded from the pension because of their income or assets.
The Australia Institute published a report on the PLS in late 2014. We argued it should be extended to all retirees who wish to boost their own incomes, not just those excluded from the pension.
Currently retiree living in a multi-million dollar home may still be eligible to draw an aged pension. Unlike other assets, owner-occupied housing is not included in the means test for the aged pension. There have long been calls to change this, to save money and make the pension more equitable.
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Pay a fortune in premiums or risk losing everything – the brutal reality of Australia’s insurance crisis
Struggling families who ditch their home and contents insurance would lose three-quarters of their wealth if their home was destroyed, according to new research by The Australia Institute.
Two new housing policies, both doomed to fail
The government’s latest housing affordability policies, “help to buy” and “build to rent” are the latest in a long line of policies from both major parties that will do nothing to ease the housing crisis.
The talk about domestic and family violence prevention is big, the funding less so
The amount committed by both political parties to preventing domestic and family violence suggests they believe there are other, more important, priorities.