Evidence-based policy gets lost in the politics of the day
In New Zealand, cabinet documents are routinely released soon after cabinet has made a decision. In fact, the New Zealand guide for accessing cabinet documents states explicitly that the need for public servants to provide “frank and fearless” advice is not a reason to keep cabinet submissions secret. Where many Australian public servants might react to this heresy by leaving out detail and problems, in New Zealand most public servants have had the opposite response. They know that their submission will most likely be read by academics, the opposition and the media so they work hard to ensure that cabinet is provided with an honest assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence and arguments for policy decisions. Yet here in Australia, where major cabinet decisions are made on late-night phone hook-ups, we will probably have to wait two decades to read what sort of “evidence” cabinet takes into account.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
5 ways and 63 billion reasons to improve Australia’s tax system
With a federal election just around the corner, new analysis from The Australia Institute reveals 63 billion reasons why our next Parliament should improve the nation’s tax system.
The rise of early voting in Australian elections
Are voters missing out on more than their democracy sausage?
Business groups want the government to overhaul the tax system? Excellent – we have some ideas.
The landslide win by the ALP has seen business groups come out demanding the government listen to their demands despite having provided them no support, and plenty of opposition, over the past 3 years.