Giving the houses a timely democratic makeover
Share
The dawn of the new 42nd Parliament is a rare chance to draw a line under certain practices of the previous decade of Parliament, practices that had undermined some of the basic tenets of parliamentary democracy. The new tone has to be set from the outset. What precisely was wrong with our old Parliament? In essence, it has not been a place where ideas or legislation have been open for robust debate. Decisions were made by the Executive in private and Parliament served as a piece of hollow theatre to progress party political concerns in public, instead of serving as the accountability mechanism it was intended to be.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
The house always wins: Why we can’t insure our way out of the climate crisis
It is time for the Australian government to admit we can’t insure our way out of the climate crisis our fossil fuel exports do so much to cause.
Hope is alive | Between the Lines
The Wrap with Emma Shortis One year after Donald Trump was elected President of the United States for a second time, New York City elected a self-declared “democratic socialist” as Mayor. Zohran Mamdani beat independent candidate, disgraced former Democrat Andrew Cuomo, by nine percentage points. In Virginia and New Jersey too, Democrats swept to double-digit victories. In California, Governor Gavin Newsom’s
The election exposed weaknesses in Australian democracy – but the next parliament can fix them
Australia has some very strong democratic institutions – like an independent electoral commission, Saturday voting, full preferential voting and compulsory voting. These ensure that elections are free from corruption; that electorate boundaries are not based on partisan bias; and that most Australians turn out to vote. They are evidence of Australia’s proud history as an