Share
Social scientists have sought to measure the degree of upward income mobility (the ability of low-income people to rise up the ladder over time) and found that some nations perform better than others on this criterion. Looking back over recent decades, Australia emerges as a more mobile (less “sticky”) society than the United States, Britain and Germany. This may be because successive Australian governments embraced more social activism than the US and Britain but did more to cultivate an open and flexible economy than Germany. This is the past. The future is much less clear. A discussion paper I have written for the Australia Institute, Equality of Opportunity in Australia – Myth and Reality, highlights the many (often growing) barriers to upward mobility faced by Australians from low income backgrounds over their lifetimes (relative to their better-off co-citizens).
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Liberals twist RBA remarks to sell a false narrative on public spending
Last week the Liberal Party shamefully misquoted the head of the Reserve Bank in a weak attempt to justify its criticism of government spending.
Who’s going to stand up and make Nazis ashamed again?
A “March for Australia” rally sounds benign, but people who plan to attend the “March for Australia” rallies around the country on Sunday will almost certainly be marching alongside white supremacists and neo-Nazis.
Australia’s big choices | Between the Lines
The Wrap with Amy Remeikis The world is at a crossroads and so far, Australia is reacting by sticking its head in the sand and pretending nothing is changing. Leaders from across the globe are about to meet at the 80th UN General Assembly, in a nation which has cancelled the visas of Palestinian Authority


