4 May 2018
Dear Auditor-General,
Supply measure projects
We refer to the proposed amendment to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. That amendment is based on 36 ‘supply measure’ projects. Supply measures aim to achieve the same environmental outcome as under the original Basin Plan, but using less water. The Commonwealth has committed $1.6 billion to implement these supply measures.
The supply measures have been developed under requirements of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan, the Intergovernmental Agreement on Implementing Water reform in the Murray Darling Basin (IGA), and the National Partnership Agreement on Implementing Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin.
The business cases for the 36 supply measure projects were due for completion in April 2017 under the IGA. The Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) has not made the business cases or costings available to the public or the Senate. The MDBA has stated that the business cases have not been finalised, despite them forming the basis of the amendment.
The Department of Agriculture and Water Resources is required to prepare and publish an annual assessment report on each Basin State’s performance against the National Partnership Agreement on Implementing Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin by 31 October each year. The assessment for the 2016-17 year has not been published. This document should contain information relevant to the supply measure projects.
The proposed projects represent a significant outlay of public monies and, if the amendment is successful, will reduce the water target for the environment by more than 20%. It is a matter of public interest and trust for the business cases, costings and annual assessment to be made available to the public and parliamentarians.
We believe that the amendment, if made, will be unlawful because the adjustment was not calculated in accordance with the method prescribed in the Basin Plan (2012). We have described why it is unlawful in our research Desperate Measures, which is attached.
We request that you undertake an audit of the SDL adjustment process, with reference to relevant financial and administrative requirements.
Yours Sincerely,
Ben Oquist
Executive Director, The Australia Institute
Related research
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Here are 23 Times Carbon Offsets Were Found to be Dodgy
Carbon offsetting has received a lot of attention recently. As businesses and governments look to meet their climate targets, many are turning to carbon offsets. That is, they are paying someone else to reduce or avoid putting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, so they don’t have to.
Victoria Should Consider Proactive Disclosure to Unclog FOI System
Victoria should consider proactive disclosure to unclog its increasingly congested FOI system, according to the Australia Institute’s submission to the inquiry into the operation of the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
PM blames drought, but there’s been over 100 cases of maladministration in Murray Darling in less than one year
Hundreds and thousands of native fish have been killed in the Murray Darling Basin. Drought is the catalyst, but mismanagement and policy failure of implementing the Murray Darling Basin Plan is the cause. The Australia InstituteFollowJan 23 ABC report on the mismanagement of the Murray Darling Basin Since allegations of large-scale water theft were first aired on Four