Originally published in Canberra Times on October 29, 2022

Talk is cheap, the saying goes, but decades of neoliberalism and failed trickle-down economics means Australia needs to begin some new and more meaningful conversations about the kind of country we want to be. With his inaugural Budget, Treasurer Jim Chalmers began a national conversation on the wellbeing of our country—as distinct from the wellbeing of our economy alone.

Tens of thousands of words will be written about the merits or otherwise of the October Budget measures, but let’s focus on one important new element introduced in this Budget: the creation of a new ‘wellbeing framework’.

Before he was Treasurer, Jim Chalmers delivered his Measuring What Matters speech in 2020 at an Australia Institute event in Brisbane, quoing US Presidential candidate Bobby Kennedy’s famous speech to the University of Kansas from 1968. On indulgence, Kennedy’s words may provide insight into the values driving Chalmers’ wellbeing framework:

“GDP counts air pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage…. GDP does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile”..”

While the budget papers are notoriously full of numbers, this year’s budget papers also contain an interesting essay also entitled ‘measuring what matters’, which outlines the case for measuring a broader range of indicators and options for how to do so.. As Treasury puts it:

“Traditional macroeconomic indicators provide important insights, but not a complete or holistic view of the community’s well-being. A broader range of social and environmental factors need to be considered to broaden the conversation about quality of life.”

Treasury is in good company. Even the creator of GDP, Simon Kuznets, warned policy makers about the limitations of GDP saying: “The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income”.

For decades Australians have been told that we need to drill for more gas, dig up more coal, cut down more trees and give tax cuts to high income earners on the basis that to do so will increase GDP. But here we are in 2022 and both the Treasurer and Treasury are now admitting that GDP is not the be all and end all. The potential consequences of this shift should not be understated. Take the Stage 3 tax cuts are a clear example.

When Scott Morrison first proposed the largest income tax cuts in history, he argued that they would boost GDP. But Morrison never argued that, of all the ways to spend a quarter of a trillion dollars, his tax cuts were a good way—let alone the best way—to boost the quality of life of Australians. While it is likely that spending $118 billion to give people earning $180,000 up to an extra $9,000 in tax cuts every year will improve the quality of some lives in Australia, it is almost certain that funding free childcare or boosting the pay of aged care workers would do far more for the wellbeing of the country as a whole.

And then there’s the enormous profits that foreign gas companies are making selling Australian oil at record prices overseas thanks to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Under current tax arrangements, the gas companies hang on to virtually all of the windfall gains, which is obviously a fantastic outcome for their largely foreign shareholders. But if Australia were to take its new wellbeing framework seriously, then surely a windfall profits tax, such as that supported by the new UK Prime Minister, and a big increase in spending on health and education here in Australia would drive a big increase in the wellbeing of Australians. Recent calls from former ACCC Commissioner Rod Sims for price and export caps on our gas are also gaining momentum as families and business struggle to pay for our own energy.

When Jim Chalmers first announced his desire to develop a wellbeing framework to guide Australia’s budget and policy processes, he was mocked by the then Treasurer Josh Frydenberg. According to Frydenberg, the idea of considering a wider range of indicators than GDP was tantamount to joining a hippie commune (I won’t repeat the offensive words he used in the chamber, for which Frydenberg was later forced to apologised to the Hindu community). But in reality, Frydenberg’s concerns with wellbeing budgeting were not that it was a waste of time, but that it would be a powerful tool for those seeking to push policies that would improve the lives of millions of Australians.

The wellbeing chapter in the budget gives little away in terms of how the indicators will be developed and in turn how they will be used in setting the priorities of the next 3 Labor budgets. It does compare Australia against the OECD average on a range of indicators on everything from life expectancy at birth to trust in government. Unsurprisingly, Australia is at or better than the OECD average on household income and wealth, worse than average but improving on the gender wage gap and we are worse than average and declining on labour underutilisation, threatened species and household debt.

The Treasurer indicated he is willing to have an big, overdue conversation about tax reform, but he has started an even bigger national conversation about what constitutes quality of life in Australia and what kind of country we want to be. Ultimately, those are democratic questions, but if Australia puts its focus on the wellbeing of its citizens, the answers will shape future Budgets in ways that will make us not just richer, but also healthier, smarter and happier.

After years of Scott Morrison, the pandemic and impending climate crisis, Australia may well be ready for a conversation about hope and vision. When Bobby Kennedy concluded his remarks in Kansas, he quoted playwright George Berbard Shaw. “Some people see things as they are and ask, ‘why?’ I dream things that never were and ask, ‘why not?'”

Ebony Bennett is Deputy Director of leading public policy think-tank the Australia Institute Twitter: @ebony_bennett

General Enquiries

Tanya Martin Executive Assistant

02 6130 0530

mail@australiainstitute.org.au

Media Enquiries

Jake Wishart Senior Media Adviser

0413 208 134

jake@australiainstitute.org.au

RSS Feed

All news