Business should be wary of cuts
Last week, the newly installed Prime Minister Kevin Rudd challenged Tony Abbott to a debate about public sector debts and deficits. If it goes ahead, it would likely be a rare respite from the slogans that have haunted Australian public debate for the past few years.
But the debate that we should be watching is one between the retail sector and the mining industry about what they each think constitutes good macroeconomic policy.
We all know the miners want the mining tax and the carbon tax abolished, but do the retailers? Would they really prefer to see consumers pay higher income taxes and the foreign owners of 83 per cent of Australian mining operations pay less?
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
10 reasons why Australia does not need company tax cuts
1/ Giving business billions of dollars in tax cuts means starving schools, hospitals and other services. Giving business billions of dollars in tax cuts means billions of dollars less for services like schools and hospitals. If Australia cut company tax from 30% to 25% this would give business about $20 billion in its first year,
Company tax cuts would do little to boost investment and hurt everyday Australians – new analysis
When Treasurer Jim Chalmers brings the nation’s economic leaders together next month, don’t be surprised if big business pushes – yet again – to cut the company tax rate.
Economic round table recycles broken ideas
A genuine debate about how to boost Australia’s productivity should bring in a wide range of groups to talk about a wide range of options, but, alas, that’s not what happened in Canberra last week.