Debt is not the villain

by Richard Denniss in The Australian Financial Review

Share

Originally published in The Australian Financial Review on May 31, 2012

The idea that the Coalition would oppose an increase in the Commonwealth’s debt ceiling makes about as much economic sense as its hostility to a market-based mechanism to address climate change. But, as with most of Tony Abbott’s big calls, it clearly makes good short-term political sense. In an age of slogans it is much easier to argue that government debt is bad than to argue it is good. But macro-economic variables are neither superheroes nor villains, and making good policy decisions is a bit harder than picking who to barrack for.

Related documents

Attachment

Between the Lines Newsletter

The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.

You might also like

10 reasons why Australia does not need company tax cuts

by Jack Thrower

1/ Giving business billions of dollars in tax cuts means starving schools, hospitals and other services. Giving business billions of dollars in tax cuts means billions of dollars less for services like schools and hospitals. If Australia cut company tax from 30% to 25% this would give business about $20 billion in its first year,

6 Reasons to Be Skeptical of Debt-Phobia

by Jim Stanford

In the lead-up to tomorrow’s pre-election Commonwealth budget, much has been written about the need to quickly eliminate the government’s deficit, and reduce its accumulated debt.  The standard shibboleths are being liberally invoked: government must face hard truths and learn to live within its means; government must balance its budget (just like households do); debt-raters will punish us for our profligacy; and more.  Pumping up fear of government debt is always an essential step in preparing the public to accept cutbacks in essential public services.   And with Australians heading to the polls, the tough-love imagery serves another function: instilling fear that a change in government, at such a fragile time, would threaten the “stability” of Australia’s economy.