Did the Labor party rip $1.2 billion out of education funding? > Check the facts
Who: “Unfortunately for the Leader of the Opposition, he is shattered that we are putting $1.2 billion into school funding that he ripped out of the school funding model before the election.” Minister for Education Christopher Pyne
The claim: That Labor took $1.2 billion out of the Gonski education funding reforms.
The facts: The previous Labor government set up a review of the schools funding model. That review recommended changes to the model and these became known as the Gonski school funding reforms. The then federal Labor government went to each of the state and territory governments, who have primary responsibility for schools, and proposed a new model of funding including an increased commitment from the federal government if the state and territory governments also increased their school funding. The then federal government also required other guarantees including that the state and territory governments not reduce their own funding to education.
The negotiations with the states and territories over the Gonski school funding reforms occurred in the lead up to the last federal election. The Labor government was able to sign up all state and territory governments except for Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory.
The Labor government set aside $1.2 billion of extra funding if Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory were to sign up to the Gonski funding reforms. When these state and territory governments were unwilling to sign up the government removed the funding from the forward estimates in its budget update just before the federal election.
During the federal election campaign the coalition committed to the Gonski education reforms. After the election the coalition has announced that it has signed up the three state and territory governments that refused to sign up before the election at a cost to the federal government of $1.2 billion. The coalition government did not require any guarantees from the state and territory governments in order to receive the additional funding.
The finding: The federal government is technically correct to say that before the election the former Labor government removed $1.2 billion of federal funding from the Gonski school funding reforms. This claim ignores the fact that Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory governments refused to sign up to the Gonski funding reforms before the election and therefore refused to take the $1.2 billion extra funding on offer.
Discussion of evidence: This claim by the government, while technically correct fails to take account of the context in which the funding was removed. The coalition state and territory governments of Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory did not like the terms of the Gonski funding agreement and so turned down the $1.2 billion in extra funding. The Labor government was ready to spend the money on education if the coalition state and territory governments were willing to sign up to the deal.
The coalition government reintroduced the $1.2 billion in extra funding after getting in principle agreement from the three state and territory governments. But it should be noted that they effectively gave the money away without requiring anything from those governments.
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
There is no such thing as a safe seat | Fact sheet
A notable trend in Australian politics has been the decline of the share of the vote won by both major parties at federal elections. One effect of this is that there are no longer any safe seats in Australian politics: minor parties and independents win more “safe” seats than they do “marginal” ones. The declining
Eight things you need to know about the Government’s plan to change Australian elections
And eight ideas to improve it
Women still underrepresented in Australian parliaments
The Australia Institute has crunched the data on women’s representation in Australian parliaments.