Dressing windows while the globe burns

by Andrew Macintosh in The Canberra Times

Share

Originally published in The Canberra Times on November 9, 2006

The recent rush of activity around climate change has led some to suggest that the Federal Government has finally got the message on the perils of global warming, but history indicates such optimism is misplaced. The Government’s announcements of the past month are just more of the window-dressing and stalling tactics that we have had to endure for more than a decade. The Government’s strategy on climate change has been simple. Deny it and muddy the waters on the science for as long as possible, while providing large subsidies to the fossil fuel industry under the guise of greenhouse programs. A major study on subsidy programs like these that was published by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2003 found they usually resulted in outcomes that would have occurred anyway. And the domestic evidence on subsidy programs backs this up. When people tell you that the Government has turned the corner on climate change, tell them to read their history. The Government will deserve accolades if it introduces a comprehensive carbon trading scheme. Anything less is just window-dressing designed to put off the inevitable.

Related documents

Attachment

Between the Lines Newsletter

The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.

You might also like

Our crisis of integrity looms in the Pacific

by Elizabeth Morison in The Canberra Times

“An Albanese Labor government will restore Australia’s climate leadership, and listen and act on Pacific island warnings of the existential threat of climate change.” Despite a clear election campaign commitment to listen to Pacific Island nations and act on climate change, the Australian government continues to enable and encourage new and expanded fossil fuel projects. When it

Looking forward, looking back | Between the Lines

The Wrap with Amy Remeikis In October 1980, before almost half the people voting in this election were born, Ronald Reagan posed what became one of the defining questions of modern politics. Are you better off today than you were four years ago? Reagan would go on to beat Carter and along with Margaret Thatcher,