Economic modelling is like The Wizard of Oz. Behind a impressive facade of power and omnipotence lies an underwhelming array of bizarre assumptions, confused theory, inadequate data, and a desire to please the customer.
Economic modelling, it seems, is loved by everyone. Lobbyists and industry groups love it as it allows them to dress up their self-interest as national interest. Politicians love modelling as it saves them having to explain how their policies will actually work and why we should support them.
And the media love modelling. Who can go past a headline like “Modelling shows carbon tax to cost 24,000 jobs in mining”? Indeed, the media’s love of modelling is the major reason that industry groups and politicians are so keen on it.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Labor’s pledge to depoliticise the public service is undermined by the government only hearing what it wants to hear on climate change
While last year’s robodebt royal commission exposed a shocking lack of ethics among senior ranks of the Australian public service, the systemic condition still largely seems to be regarded as an aberration.
Rushed changes to federal political donation laws could hinder, not enhance, democracy
With the Albanese Government announcing it will attempt to rush through major changes to Australian elections, democracy experts at The Australia Institute warn that any changes should increase the competitiveness of elections, and not make the playing field more uneven for new entrants.
Open Letter Calls for Parliament to Protect Democracy, Close Major Gaps in Electoral Laws
Leading civil society organisations have signed an open letter, coordinated by the Australia Institute and published today in The Canberra Times, calling on the Parliament of Australia to safeguard Australia’s democracy by addressing major gaps in the nation’s electoral laws.