Gray must not follow Ferguson’s path
A cabinet reshuffle provides the perfect opportunity for a prime minister to clarify the role of incoming ministers. From his deeds, it’s pretty clear Martin Ferguson interpreted his job as representing the interests of those who profit from extracting our resources rather than the citizens who own those resources. And given their praise on his way out the door, foreign miners saw it the same way. The financial and environmental cost of Martin Ferguson’s time in cabinet is inestimable but hardly insignificant. Treasury estimates the second version of the mining tax will collect around $60”‰billion less than the first. Given the “deep understanding” that he had of the mining industry, the only thing that’s unclear is whether he was a willing accomplice in this greatest of tax heists or whether he was just a patsy who fell for their cheap praise.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
Should Australia ban fossil fuel advertising?
A tobacco-style ban on fossil fuel advertising would be a decisive win for Australia – and the climate.
There is no such thing as a safe seat | Fact sheet
A notable trend in Australian politics has been the decline of the share of the vote won by both major parties at federal elections. One effect of this is that there are no longer any safe seats in Australian politics: minor parties and independents win more “safe” seats than they do “marginal” ones. The declining
Eight things you need to know about the Government’s plan to change Australian elections
And eight ideas to improve it