Don’t bet on the pokies to deliver revenue

by Bill Browne

Share

As the Tasmanian government seeks to limit spending on the pokies, the data shows how much gambling takes from society, and how little it delivers in revenue

With the Rockliff Government in Tasmania planning to place spending limits on poker machines by 2024, attention has turned again to gambling in Australia. A look at how much Australians lose gambling each year, and how much state and territory governments make in gambling revenue shows poker machines are a terrible way to raise revenue.

A common argument from the clubs industry is that poker machines and gambling are a vital source of revenue that provides for public and social services. But the data shows that gambling takes far more than it gives.

It’s no surprise that Western Australia has the lowest gambling expenditure. Western Australia prohibits poker machines outside of the state’s one casino. By international standards, WA is normal and the other states and territories are the exception. Only 12 of 238 countries allow poker machines in pubs and clubs.

Despite having the lowest losses, WA has similar per capita revenue from gambling as Tasmania, and more revenue than the ACT. The state’s lucrative lottery, called Lotterywest, accounts for one-third of gambling expenditure but three-quarters of state gambling revenue.

NSW, despite being the state with the largest number of poker machines and the highest per-capita level of gambling within Australia, receives less revenue relative to actual gambling expenditure than all states and territories except the ACT.

Poker machines and gambling are a terrible way to raise revenue. They target lower income earners and leave society worse off overall.

Related research

Between the Lines Newsletter

The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.

You might also like

Worth a Punt – 2% Levy on Gambling Revenue Could Replace Free-To-Air Advertising Spend

by Stephen Long and David Richardson

There is widespread public support for banning gambling advertisements on free-to-air media because of the harm caused by gambling. The main objection is that Australia’s free-to-air networks, hit by declining revenues and fragmenting audiences, can’t afford to lose the money. But there’s a simple solution. A small levy on the many billions of dollars gambling

For a robust democracy, we need a working anti-corruption system and truth in political advertising

by Evie Simpson in The Mercury

Transparency, integrity and accountability were buzzwords of the 2024 state election, yet Tasmanians went to the polls without knowing where their politicians get their money, without laws requiring truth in political advertising, and without an anti-corruption body that is fit for purpose.