There is a disparity between politicians’ love of symbolism and shareholders’ love of results. Unfortunately for Prime Minister Tony Abbott, that disparity seems set to distance his government even further from the agenda of the mainstream business community in Australia.
As if proposing to introduce a new levy on corporate profits and increasing the top marginal tax rate wasn’t enough, now some in the Abbott government are determined to reduce investor certainty in the energy sector and drive up wholesale electricity prices just to send a message to the greenies.
Despite the fact that the renewable energy target (RET) was originally created by the Howard government back in 2001, the most conservative faction of the Liberals seems determined to scrap it. The problem for the business community, and indeed for the government itself, is that this determination has got nothing to do with lowering costs for business and everything to do with symbolism.
Related documents
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
New Analysis: Mid-East war’s hit to Australian economy, how to reduce its impact
New analysis by The Australia Institute reveals the impact the war in the Middle East is likely to have on Australian households – and recommends policies to limit the hardship.
Australia has significant power in the world, we should be using it more wisely
There are just under 200 countries in the world and Australia is in the G20.
Tony Abbott’s policy muddle was clear to all
First published in the Australian Financial Review – here It’s bizarre that people blame Tony Abbott’s demise on his inability to communicate. He was a great communicator, and people knew exactly what he stood for. No politician was as relentlessly ‘on message’. Abbott’s problem wasn’t the clarity of his message; it was the incoherence of