Who is right on emissions? > Check the facts
Who: “If Mr Abbott can justify his wild assertion of a 50 per cent reduction in emissions, he needs to tell us what alternative figures he is using, or immediately retract his fanciful claim.” Greens WA spokesperson on Climate Change, Robin Chapple MLC.
The claim: The Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott was incorrect in his comments on greenhouse gas emissions when interviewed on the ABC on Monday night.
The facts: Tony Abbott claimed that: “Australia’s emissions intensity has reduced by about 50 per cent over the last two decades,”. This claim was refuted in a fact published by The Australia Institute on Tuesday 3 September 2013.
However, Robin Chapple, himself has mistaken emissions intensity with total emissions in his media release (5 September). Chapple makes the point that there was a 31 per cent increase in emissions of greenhouse gasses in the previous twenty years and not a 50 per cent reduction as he argues Tony Abbott claimed.
Tony Abbott was referring to emissions as a proportion of GDP whereas Robin Chapple is referring to absolute emissions.
The finding: Robin Chapple has misrepresented Tony Abbott’s claim regarding emissions intensity.
Discussion of evidence: In the political debate over the actions Australia has taken and might take in the future to address global warming all sides appear to be straying from the facts to further their political agenda.
Between the Lines Newsletter
The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.
You might also like
LULUCF explained: Why Australia’s emissions aren’t actually going down
Australia’s emissions reduction claims simply don’t add up.
Here are 23 Times Carbon Offsets Were Found to be Dodgy
Carbon offsetting has received a lot of attention recently. As businesses and governments look to meet their climate targets, many are turning to carbon offsets. That is, they are paying someone else to reduce or avoid putting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, so they don’t have to.
Why maintaining ambition for 1.5°C is critical | Bill Hare
One of the key things about this whole problem is that the only way to solve it is that we need to rapidly reduce and phase out fossil fuels. That can’t wait a decade. We need to be making substantial reductions this decade.