In infrastructure funding, nothing is certain save debt and taxes

by Richard Denniss in The Australian Financial Review

Share

Originally published in The Australian Financial Review on October 8, 2013

While the Coalition is yet to turn around a boat carrying asylum seekers, it has already made a stunning turnaround on the issue of government debt. Having raged against the ALP’s high-taxing, high-spending ways for the past six years Joe Hockey now wants us to be a bit more sophisticated in our approach to public finance.

After spending years deliberately conflating public sector debt and private sector debt in order to better scare the electorate, Hockey now wants us to distinguish between “good debt” which is used to fund infrastructure, and “bad debt” which is used for recurrent expenditure.

Related documents

Attachment

Between the Lines Newsletter

The biggest stories and the best analysis from the team at the Australia Institute, delivered to your inbox every fortnight.

You might also like

What is a ‘fund’?

by Jack Thrower

You’ve likely heard a lot about ‘funds’ in this election campaign; the Coalition announced a few of them and promised to make huge savings by canning funds created by the Albanese Government. Funds can be a confusing concept, so here’s an explainer.