In reverse

The wrong way to fuel savings and falling transport emissions
by Matt Saunders, Matt Grudnoff and Rod Campbell

Australia’s light duty vehicle fleet is among the least fuel efficient in the world, using 24% more fuel per kilometre travelled than the UK. If the UK’s modest standards could be met here, Australian drivers would save $13 billion a year in fuel costs and overall transport emissions would be 17% lower.

It is hard to overstate the significance of the role of transport emissions in achieving national greenhouse gas reduction targets. Transport is both a major source of greenhouse gas emissions— accounting for 18% of Australia’s total emissions and the second largest source after electricity (34%)—and one of the easiest sources to abate.

The widespread availability of more fuel-efficient vehicles and zero-emission vehicles means that there are many reasonably straightforward ways transport emissions can be reduced.

At the same time, with historically high fuel prices, the path to lowering transport emissions — burning less petrol and diesel — is also the path to major cost savings for households, as well as significantly improving the nation’s fuel security.

In Reverse: The wrong way to fuel savings and falling transport emissions

Share